91ÊÓƵ

Introduction to the project

Project outputs

Australia and New Zealand in the Pacific Islands: Ambiguous Allies?

Our initial argued that divergences in Australia and New Zealand’s policies and practices raise questions about the status of their alliance and how the two states will work together to address challenges in the Pacific Islands.

We identify four points of convergence between Australia and New Zealand in the Pacific Islands as well as four points of divergence. We argue that the Australia-New Zealand alliance can be strengthened to benefit Australia, New Zealand, and the Pacific Islands through greater burden-sharing, combining their respective strengths in hard and soft power, strengthening existing regional institutions, and promoting closer consultations on Pacific issues.

Burden-sharing: the US, Australia and New Zealand alliances in the Pacific Islands

Our first explored alliance management – particularly burden-sharing – under the Australia-New Zealand and Australia-US alliances and was published in International Affairs.

We argued that traditional understandings of alliance management that focus primarily on military contributions need to be rethought, particularly in the Pacific Islands, where meeting non-traditional security challenges such as economic, social, and environmental issues, is equally important.

Smooth sailing? Australia, New Zealand and the United States partnering in-and with-the Pacific Islands

Our second analysed how Australia, New Zealand and the United States have partnered - and should partner - on security issues in the Pacific Islands region. It recommended that, when seeking to enhance their engagement in the region and work together, the three states should:

1. Ensure that Pacific priorities direct activity, particularly the expanded concept of security outlined in the 2018 Boe Declaration on Regional Security by the Pacific Islands Forum and the ambitions of the 2050 Strategy for the Blue Pacific Continent.
2. Include Pacific Island countries in their cooperative mechanisms, such as the Pacific Quad, the FRANZ arrangement and the Partners in the Blue Pacific initiative.
3. Ensure that initiatives don’t undermine existing regional frameworks but instead expand on established mechanisms, rather than create new ones. Opportunities include:

1. The formation of a PIF Secretariat Donor Coordination Unit (funded by donors) to revitalise and operationalise the Cairns Compact on Strengthening Development Coordination in the Pacific;
2. Strengthening the Forum Dialogue Partners’ convening power by channelling PBP activities through the Dialogue Partners mechanism to ensure Forum oversight and to streamline engagement;
3. Supporting the Forum Officials Subcommittee on Regional Security; and
4. The creation of a Pacific Coordination Centre for Humanitarian Assistance within the PIF Secretariat.

4. Support regional management of geopolitical challenges through facilitating the creation of a Pacific Regional Forum for security dialogue between PIF members and their dialogue partners, modelled on the ASEAN Regional Forum. This could be achieved through expanding the Forum Dialogue Partners mandate. [This recommendation has been picked-up by .
5. Support strategic dialogues—including the proposed Suva Dialogue convened by the PIF—that would provide opportunities for deepening mutual understanding, building relationships and elevating the profiles of Pacific thinkers in Australia, New Zealand, the US and other partners.
6. Avoid competing with one another and instead cooperate more closely to pool their collective strengths.

Commentary

We have also published several opinion pieces related to the project.

First, on on its foreign policy approach to China.

Second, on whether Australia and New Zealand are of the ANZUS alliance burden in the Pacific Islands.

Third, on whether to the Australia-New Zealand alliance.

Fourth, on how in the Pacific Islands.

Fifth, on how the election of the Albanese government in Australia might .

Sixth, on how an expanded and empowered to Pacific security.

Seventh, on how the are likely to evolve.

Eighth, on how Australia and New Zealand could build their .

Ninth, on whether the anything from ASEAN.

Tenth, on - with New Zealand.

Eleventh, on the in the Pacific Islands.

Roundtables and interviews

We held roundtables in Canberra in November 2023 and Wellington in February 2024, accompanied by interviews with key leaders, officials, and scholars to gather their views and learn from their expertise.

Special issue: the Australia-New Zealand alliance

We have guest-edited a special issue of the , due for publication in October 2024, that features discussion articles by several of the experts who participated in our roundtables and interviews.Ìý

These experts’ discussion articles represent a spectrum of views from both sides of the Tasman, united by an acknowledgement of the importance of the alliance to both countries, but with differing perceptions of how the alliance should operate in the future, how it should shape each countries’ foreign and strategic policies, and of how it has influenced how their policies and behaviour in their shared region of special interest, the Pacific Islands.Ìý
The contents of the special issue is set out below and will be updated with links once articles are published online.

• ‘The Australia-New Zealand alliance: Introduction to the special section’, Joanne Wallis and Anna Powles
• ‘Different nightmares, shared dreams? Australia and New Zealand’s intuitive alliance’, Anna Powles and Joanne Wallis
• ‘’, Michael D. Cohen
• ‘In the same boat – a case for Trans-Tasman strategic integration’, Rob Laurs
• ‘’, Hugh White
• ‘’, Bethan Greener
• ‘’, Brendan Taylor
• ‘Strategically (in)secure and economically (in)vulnerable: Australia, New Zealand and their relations with China’, Darren J. Lim and Walter Brenno Colnaghi
• ‘’, Jason Young
• Deep South: Antarctica and the Australia-New Zealand Strategic Relationship, Elizabeth Buchanan
• ‘New Zealand, Australia and AUKUS’, Robert G. Patman
• ‘The Strategic Case for New Zealand to Join AUKUS Pillar 2’, Reuben Steff
• ‘Advantages, Opportunities and Benefits of AUKUS Pillar 2 for New Zealand’, Cathy Downes
• ‘AUKUS and New Zealand’s foreign policy in the Pacific region’, Marco de Jong
• ‘’, Nicholas Ross Smith and Lauren Bland
• ‘On being the pãlagi in the Pacific family’, Soli Middleby

The project team

• - University of Adelaide
• , Massey University
• , University of Adelaide

Ìý